Intermittent fasting (IF) restricts eating to specific time windows rather than limiting calories—typically 16:8 (16-hour fast, 8-hour eating window). The 2016-2019 trend promised weight loss, longevity, and metabolic benefits through “when you eat” over “what you eat,” though critics warned of disordered eating disguised as wellness.
The Popular Methods
16:8: Fast 16 hours (including sleep), eat within 8-hour window (e.g., noon-8pm)
5:2: Eat normally 5 days, restrict to 500-600 calories 2 days
OMAD: One meal a day (23-hour fast)
Alternate-day fasting: Fast every other day
Warrior Diet: 20-hour fast, 4-hour eating window
Most popular: 16:8 (skipping breakfast).
The Claimed Benefits
Proponents cited research on:
- Autophagy: Cellular cleanup during fasting
- Insulin sensitivity: Lower blood sugar
- Human Growth Hormone: Increases during fasting
- Weight loss: Calorie restriction via time restriction
- Longevity: Animal studies showing lifespan extension
- Mental clarity: Ketone production
Silicon Valley biohackers (Jack Dorsey, Phil Libin) popularized IF as productivity tool.
The Reddit & YouTube Communities
r/intermittentfasting (1M+ members) shared:
- Before/after weight loss photos
- Fasting tracker screenshots
- “What I eat in my window” posts
- Progress updates
- Troubleshooting tips
YouTubers (Thomas DeLauer, Dr. Berg) built channels on IF content, some spreading misinformation alongside science.
The Scientific Reality
Research showed:
- Weight loss: Mostly from calorie restriction (can achieve without IF)
- No metabolic advantage: IF vs. regular calorie restriction = similar results
- Individual variation: Some thrive, others struggle
- Long-term data lacking: Most studies <1 year
- Gender differences: Women may respond differently (hormonal disruption)
Not magic bullet portrayed.
The Disordered Eating Concerns
Eating disorder specialists warned:
- Restriction glorification: Fasting language normalizing deprivation
- Binge risk: Extreme hunger from fasting triggers overeating
- Obsessive focus: Tracking eating windows compounds food anxiety
- Gateway: IF often precedes eating disorder development
- Disguise: Socially acceptable restriction for those with disordered patterns
Studies linked IF to increased eating disorder behaviors in vulnerable populations.
The Gendered Marketing
IF disproportionately marketed to women for weight loss, while men received “optimization” messaging. The diet culture disguised as biohacking allowed women to pursue thinness under wellness guise.
The Coffee & Supplements Industry
“Fasting-friendly” products exploded:
- Bulletproof coffee (breaking fast? Debated)
- BCAAs for fasted workouts
- Electrolyte supplements
- Fasting apps (subscription-based)
The irony: monetizing eating less.
The 2020+ Evolution
Pandemic + intuitive eating movement tempered IF hype:
- Listen to hunger cues vs. rigid windows
- Flexible approach (not every day)
- Medical supervision recommended
- Not suitable for everyone (athletes, pregnant women, diabetics, ED history)
The Verdict
IF works for some via calorie restriction and structure. But framing as superior to other approaches lacks evidence. Main benefit: simplifying calorie control by limiting eating time.
Read more: