One-on-one meetings between managers and direct reports became standard management practice in the 2010s, promoted as essential for employee development, feedback, and relationship-building, though quality varied enormously depending on manager skill.
The Management Best Practice
Leadership books and management consultants championed regular one-on-ones (weekly or bi-weekly, 30-60 minutes) as crucial management tools. The ideal: dedicated time for career discussions, feedback, problem-solving, and relationship-building away from project-focused team meetings. Companies like Intel, Google, and tech startups institutionalized one-on-ones as non-negotiable management requirements.
The Reality Spectrum
One-on-one quality ranged dramatically: great managers used them for genuine development conversations, coaching, and removing obstacles. Bad managers treated them as status update meetings (should be handled asynchronously), canceled frequently (signaling employees don’t matter), or made them uncomfortable interrogations. Some employees dreaded one-on-ones with difficult managers, preferring to be left alone. The meetings revealed management skill—or lack thereof.
The Structure Debate
Management Twitter debated one-on-one best practices: Should managers set agendas or let employees drive? How much time for work vs. personal check-ins? Should they discuss performance issues or save that for formal reviews? Remote work complicated logistics but also made scheduling easier (no conference room hunting). By 2023, consensus emerged: one-on-ones work when managers genuinely care about development, listen more than talk, and respect employees’ time. Otherwise, they’re just another wasteful meeting.
Sources: