VotingRightsAct2013

Twitter 2013-06 politics active
Also known as: shelbycountyrestorevravotingrights

The Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. Holder decision (June 25, 2013) gutted the Voting Rights Act by striking down Section 4’s preclearance formula, allowing states with histories of discrimination to change election laws without federal approval. Within hours, Texas and other states implemented voter ID laws and redistricting previously blocked, triggering decade-long battle over voting access.

The Voting Rights Act (1965)

The VRA’s Section 5 required “covered jurisdictions” (mostly Southern states with discrimination histories) to get federal preclearance before changing voting laws. Section 4 determined which jurisdictions were covered using outdated 1965/1972 formulas.

The Shelby County Case

Shelby County, Alabama sued arguing Section 4’s formula was outdated—based on 1965-era data despite transformed South. Chief Justice Roberts’ 5-4 majority opinion agreed: “Our country has changed” and current discrimination didn’t justify federal oversight using 40-year-old metrics.

Justice Ginsburg’s dissent: “Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”

Immediate State Actions

Within 24 hours:

  • Texas implemented strict voter ID law previously blocked
  • Mississippi, Alabama enacted similar laws
  • North Carolina passed sweeping restrictions

By 2016, 14 previously covered states passed new restrictions. Studies showed disproportionate impact on Black, Latino, young, and low-income voters.

The Decade of Litigation (2013-2023)

Each restriction faced lawsuits. Some struck down (North Carolina’s law deemed “surgical” racial targeting), others upheld. The preclearance system’s absence shifted burden from states proving non-discrimination to individuals suing after harm.

The For the People Act & John Lewis Act

Democrats repeatedly tried restoring VRA protections: H.R.1/S.1 (For the People Act) and John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Both passed House but died in Senate due to filibuster. By 2023, no federal solution emerged.

The 2020-2022 Voting Wars

Trump’s “Stop the Steal” lies prompted Republican states to pass 400+ restrictive bills 2021-2022: mail ballot limits, drop box restrictions, poll watcher expansions, partisan election oversight. Democrats framed it as modern Jim Crow.

The Broader Impact

Shelby validated states’ rights framing over civil rights enforcement. Combined with Citizens United (2010), the Roberts Court systematically deregulated democracy—money in politics and voting access constraints benefiting Republicans.

Read more:

Explore #VotingRightsAct2013

Related Hashtags